Christianity in itself is controversial. The history of the church is filled with outbreaks of violence as the message of Christ was spread. One reason was due to fact that this radical new message was based on the free grace of a God who chose to save His creation by the sacrificial death of His Son.
This was wild. The early church faced a lot of challenges. We should not be surprised to face some of the same challenges. We can learn from the example of the early church about how to deal with conflict and violence that comes as a result of this life-changing message. It is up to us to adapt our approach to make the biggest impact. Is there a similarity between religious life in the first century prior to Pentecost and that of most churches and Christian communities today? Clearly, the answer is yes. Sure, there are differences: We have all the conveniences of 21st century technology—printed Bibles, Christian radio and TV broadcasts and the Internet. These wonderful tools should aid us greatly in an effort to transform our culture; but in spite of the differences in technology and information availability, today’s typical religious life seems anemic and ineffectual. The average American church appears to have little impact on the culture around us. Why?
The church today is not what the church was intended to be. The church started as a missionary movement in Jerusalem. It moved to Rome and became an institution. It traveled to Europe and became a culture. It crossed the Atlantic to America and became a big business. While this is simplistic, it rings true. It appears that religious people have, on the whole, lost their transforming salt and are no longer an attractive light that most people want to follow.
It may seem strange to think that traditional evangelism is in its last gasps when some North American churches seem to be increasing in number. Indeed, if the measure of success is church attendance, donations, people’s participation, lots of programs and square footage of our church structures, then many of today’s churches would be considered overwhelming successful. However, are these factors valid measurements for the success of a church? If not, what is?
The apostle Paul established some indicators. He said the leadership of the church was responsible “to equip God’s people to do His work” so they would be “mature and full grown in the Lord, measuring up to the full stature of Christ” (
Just as in the first century, a new church is emerging that is measuring its success not by the numbers of those participating in religious programs, but by its transformed lives. These churches measure their success by the lives of those who profess to be Christians. Their standard is simple Christ-likeness and how the transformed lives of their members impact the community around them. During the past few decades, youth ministry has been on the cutting edge of relevant ministry. As Paul pointed out that if we are going to make an impact, we must understand the condition of the post-modern mind and develop youth ministries that seek to meet individuals where they are. Considering the condition of the church and what is has become, we must be willing to think outside the box and be proactive in our approach to reaching this generation.
I realize that if we are going to make an impact on this generation, we must get back to the model of the early church. It didn’t take thousands of people to launch God’s transformational kingdom movement in Jerusalem in the first century. There were only 120 in the upper room, pouring out their hearts to God in agreement when His transforming Spirit empowered them to engage their city. From Jerusalem, they turned the known world rightside up. What did they do, and how did they do it? A study of the early church reveals how they grew and stayed focused on the mission Christ gave them. There were many factors involved; and we must practice these, as well.
First, I must proclaim a transformational message. The new kingdom was not about changing the government; it was about transforming each individual life. I must have a burden to reach the lost and truly seek to help students find the transforming power of Christ.
Second, my youth ministry must embrace a missional focus. Church growth should not be our goal; it is a by-product. My strategy has to come together in the prayer of agreement, unify around God’s heart of compassion and engage the city with a message of Christ’s love that meet people’s needs. That will result in converts. Converts will result in disciples, and the youth ministry and church will become more authentic and experience growth.
Third, I must help my students become living models of transformation. People aren’t attracted to preaching personalities or church buildings or church programs. They are attracted to a people who demonstrate love and care for others, people who have a clear sense of purpose and convictions worth dying for.
Our culture today has similarities to that of the first century. The needs of people are the same now as then. People in our community will respond and can be changed by the same message of transformation, they will respond to the same missional focus, and they will be attracted to authentic models of transformation.
